This practice raises a number of human rights, transparency, and due process related concerns. To stay up to date on how Meta is responding to the Oversight Board’s decisions and recommendations, please visit the Transparency Center. Law enforcement authorities may do this informally or through formal structures, such as Internal Referral Units (IRU). Oversight Board Meta Oversight Board The Oversight Board is an independent body that people can appeal to if they disagree with decisions we made about content on Facebook or Instagram. This practice of law enforcement flagging content for companies to review against their Terms of Service (TOS) is part of a growing arsenal state authorities use to pursue content removal from online services. The user who created the post was notified by Meta both times their content was removed but was not informed that the removals were initiated by a request from UK law enforcement. The post was then reviewed by an internal team at Meta and was taken down for violating the company’s Violence and Incitement policy, which Meta informed the Board can only be enforced by Meta’s internal teams. It is not clear from the Case Summary whether the authority identified the post to be a violation of local UK law. The law enforcement authority informed Meta that the post referenced a past shooting and could provoke further violence. The post featured a short clip from a new drill music video from rapper Chinx (OS). #Meta oversight board OfflineMeta did not respond to The Independent’s request for comment about that content moderation decision.The Center for Democracy & Technology welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on case 2022-007-IG-MR (updated link) before the Facebook Oversight Board regarding the takedown of an Instagram post following a request from UK law enforcement alleging that the post may contribute to offline violence.Ī post from an account promoting UK drill music was taken down by Instagram following a request from local law enforcement. So, in order to remove any ambiguity about our stance, we are further narrowing our guidance to make explicit that we are not allowing calls for the death of a head of state on our platforms.” “We also do not permit calls to assassinate a head of state. “We are now narrowing the focus to make it explicitly clear in the guidance that it is never to be interpreted as condoning violence against Russians in general,” Meta global affairs President Nick Clegg wrote in a post on the company’s internal platform on Sunday that was seen by Reuters. However, it later walked back that moderation decision to make it stricter. Meta was previously debating similar content moderation decisions for Facebook and Instagram users in some countries calling for or violence against Russians and the death of Vladimir Putin as part of a moderation change that allowed posts promoting violence against Russian forces. The organization had previously argued that Meta’s Oversight Board in an effort to streamline processes to ensure freedom of expression is protected for users who rely on their platform in Iran last month, because “Instagram suffers from a deficit in trust and transparency when it comes to content moderation practices for the Persian community”. This content is not available due to your privacy preferences. Under the newsworthiness allowance, Meta allows violating content on its platforms "if keeping it visible is in the public interest." Meta since said that its decision to remove the content was in error, and should have been allowed online under a “newsworthiness” allowance that rose to prominence among social media companies in the wake of former President Trump, who would often post content that would violate platforms’ terms and conditions. The user appealed the decision, but was automatically closed they have now made an appeal to the oversight board, stating that “the post criticizes the Iran ‘dictatorship’ and human rights violations in Iran.” The post, which was shared in a group with fewer than 1000 members, was reported under Meta’s hate speech rules and – after human review – Meta removed it. It calls on women in Iran not to collaborate in the oppression of women”, Meta’s Oversight Board describes. This calls for death to the ‘anti-women Islamic government’ and for death to its ‘filthy leader Khamenei.’ It calls the Islamic Republic the worst dictatorship in history, in part due to restrictions on what people can wear. “A text bubble in Farsi next to Ayatollah Khamenei says that being a woman is forbidden.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |